A special context of the concept. Special context means that, to conceptualize corruption, one must take into consideration the impact that the changing context may have on the term. In the past decades, scholars have made great endeavors to search for a universal definition of corruption based on the assumption of the existence of an all-inclusive conception of corruption. In a great measure, this assumption neglects the fact that corruption is not a static notion, but a dynamic one which evolves over time and differs from society to society. Depending on the individual, ideology, paradigm, culture, or other context, the term "corruption" can mean different things to different people. Corruption, in particular, has to be analyzed within a political environment specific to a country. I know all details about written term papers as students get advices with writing essays. This is because politics not only affects the understanding and explanation of corruption, but also produces and identifies certain social behavior as corrupt. Hence, it is not enough just to investigate corruption practices per se. One should also investigate, as J. F. Medard suggests, the attitude and performance of the political system toward corruption: the exposure of corruption by the press, by the party in power, by different factions, and by the populist opposition, as well as the reaction of government to corruption, whether symbolic, administrative, or judiciary. With all these considerations in mind, this blog regards corruption as a kind of bureaucratic behavior which deviates from the norm stipulated by a given political context. This working definition is of particular help toward a better understanding of China's corruption problem.

Bookmark: